2nd Year
FACEBOOK , and TWITTER . These two
social networking sites work quite differently, but have the same core idea: to
socialize on the web.
Facebook is a website that allows you to connect with your friends,
share what you are doing, share photos, organize events, play games, and much
more. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Twitter is a
website that allows you to post shot, 140 character updates, and allows you to
“follow” what your friends are doing, even if they don’t want to follow you.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Now, although
these websites are alike in some ways, and different in others, many people
compare them on the same level. In my eyes, though, they are two websites for
completely different purposes.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h3><span style='color:black'>Twitter<o:p></o:p></span></h3>
<p><span style='color:black'><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/twitter"
target="_blank"><span style='text-decoration:none;text-underline:none'><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype
id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t"
path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter"/>
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"/>
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"/>
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"/>
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"/>
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" alt=""
href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/twitter" target=""_blank""
style='width:225pt;height:204pt' o:button="t">
<v:imagedata src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image001.png"
o:href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2010/07/01/54561v2max450x450_1.png"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout'><img
border=0 width=300 height=272
src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image002.jpg"
v:shapes="_x0000_i1025"></span><![endif]></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>visiting extra
web pages and leaving the site can be tiresome, I consider it to be better than
the clutter that comes with facebook.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h3><span style='color:black'>Facebook<o:p></o:p></span></h3>
Facebook is a website that allows you to connect with your friends,
share what you are doing, share photos, organize events, play games, and much
more. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Twitter is a
website that allows you to post shot, 140 character updates, and allows you to
“follow” what your friends are doing, even if they don’t want to follow you.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Now, although
these websites are alike in some ways, and different in others, many people
compare them on the same level. In my eyes, though, they are two websites for
completely different purposes.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h3><span style='color:black'>Twitter<o:p></o:p></span></h3>
<p><span style='color:black'><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/twitter"
target="_blank"><span style='text-decoration:none;text-underline:none'><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype
id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t"
path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter"/>
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"/>
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"/>
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"/>
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"/>
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" alt=""
href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/twitter" target=""_blank""
style='width:225pt;height:204pt' o:button="t">
<v:imagedata src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image001.png"
o:href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2010/07/01/54561v2max450x450_1.png"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout'><img
border=0 width=300 height=272
src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image002.jpg"
v:shapes="_x0000_i1025"></span><![endif]></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>visiting extra
web pages and leaving the site can be tiresome, I consider it to be better than
the clutter that comes with facebook.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h3><span style='color:black'>Facebook<o:p></o:p></span></h3>
<p><span style='color:black'><a
href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/facebook" target="_blank"><span
style='text-decoration:none;text-underline:none'><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape
id="_x0000_i1026" type="#_x0000_t75" alt=""
href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/facebook" target=""_blank""
style='width:337.8pt;height:153.6pt' o:button="t">
<v:imagedata src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image003.png"
o:href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2010/07/01/42816v1max450x450_1.png"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout'><img
border=0 width=450 height=205
src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image004.jpg"
v:shapes="_x0000_i1026"></span><![endif]></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><a name=5min></a><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>When
comparing Facebook to Twitter, many differences arise. Facebook is a more
intimate site, that allows friends to have live conversations, comment on
others statuses, share photo albums, organize events, and more.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Facebook also
has more privacy settings than Twitter. It allows you to pick and choose who
sees your photos and statuses, who can view your profile info, etc. You can
choose to make your whole profile public, but it is set to private by default.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h3><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Conclusion<o:p></o:p></span></h3>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Twitter allows
you to communicate to multitudes of people, while Facebook allows you to choose
who you communicate with. Neither is better than the other overall, but they
each excel at different tasks.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;
mso-fareast-language:ES;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'><br style='mso-special-character:
line-break'>
<![if !supportLineBreakNewLine]><br style='mso-special-character:line-break'>
<![endif]></span>
Facebook is a
website that allows you to connect with your friends, share what you are doing,
share photos, organize events, play games, and much more.
Twitter is a
website that allows you to post shot, 140 character updates, and allows you to
“follow” what your friends are doing, even if they don’t want to follow you.
Now, although
these websites are alike in some ways, and different in others, many people
compare them on the same level. In my eyes, though, they are two websites for
completely different purposes.
Facebook is a website that allows you to connect with your friends,
share what you are doing, share photos, organize events, play games, and much
more. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Twitter is a
website that allows you to post shot, 140 character updates, and allows you to
“follow” what your friends are doing, even if they don’t want to follow you.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Now, although
these websites are alike in some ways, and different in others, many people
compare them on the same level. In my eyes, though, they are two websites for
completely different purposes.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h3><span style='color:black'>Twitter<o:p></o:p></span></h3>
<p><span style='color:black'><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/twitter"
target="_blank"><span style='text-decoration:none;text-underline:none'><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype
id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t"
path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter"/>
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"/>
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"/>
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"/>
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"/>
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"/>
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"/>
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" alt=""
href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/twitter" target=""_blank""
style='width:225pt;height:204pt' o:button="t">
<v:imagedata src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image001.png"
o:href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2010/07/01/54561v2max450x450_1.png"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout'><img
border=0 width=300 height=272
src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image002.jpg"
v:shapes="_x0000_i1025"></span><![endif]></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>visiting extra
web pages and leaving the site can be tiresome, I consider it to be better than
the clutter that comes with facebook.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h3><span style='color:black'>Facebook<o:p></o:p></span></h3>
<p><span style='color:black'><a
href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/facebook" target="_blank"><span
style='text-decoration:none;text-underline:none'><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape
id="_x0000_i1026" type="#_x0000_t75" alt=""
href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/facebook" target=""_blank""
style='width:337.8pt;height:153.6pt' o:button="t">
<v:imagedata src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image003.png"
o:href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2010/07/01/42816v1max450x450_1.png"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout'><img
border=0 width=450 height=205
src="file:///C:\Users\Karina\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image004.jpg"
v:shapes="_x0000_i1026"></span><![endif]></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><a name=5min></a><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>When
comparing Facebook to Twitter, many differences arise. Facebook is a more
intimate site, that allows friends to have live conversations, comment on
others statuses, share photo albums, organize events, and more.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Facebook also
has more privacy settings than Twitter. It allows you to pick and choose who
sees your photos and statuses, who can view your profile info, etc. You can
choose to make your whole profile public, but it is set to private by default.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<h3><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Conclusion<o:p></o:p></span></h3>
<p><span lang=EN-US style='color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>Twitter allows
you to communicate to multitudes of people, while Facebook allows you to choose
who you communicate with. Neither is better than the other overall, but they
each excel at different tasks.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;
mso-fareast-language:ES;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'><br style='mso-special-character:
line-break'>
<![if !supportLineBreakNewLine]><br style='mso-special-character:line-break'>
<![endif]></span>
When comparing
Facebook to Twitter, many differences arise. Facebook is a more intimate site ,
that allows friends to have live conversations, comment on others statuses,
share photo albums, organize events, and more.
Facebook also
has more privacy settings than Twitter. It allows you to pick and choose who
sees your photos and statuses, who can view your profile info, etc. You can
choose to make your whole profile public, but it is set to private by default.
Conclusion
Twitter allows
you to communicate to multitudes of people, while Facebook allows you to choose
who you communicate with. Neither is better than the other overall, but they
each excel at different tasks.
9 comments:
I like FACE IS EASIER TO USE HAS MORE PRIVACY
TWITTER IS ALSO FAMOUS FOR SOMETHING SO O
TWITTER IS MORE COMPLICATED TO USE EVEN THAT I HAVE FRIENDS IN SOCIAL NETWORK
Yes, Fede...You are right!
Very Good!
facebook faster
nico fernandez 2d
for me to use them many famous twiter
fede 2°c
facebook is better than twiter
fede 2°c
1-Facebook is more interesting than twitter.
Facebook es más interesante que twitter.
Esta respuesta la había hecho bien.
2-Facebook is faster than twitter.
Facebook es más rápido que twitter.
En esta respuesta me había equivocado porque use el more en una palabra corta y el more se usa en palabras largas.
3-Twitter is the most modern.
Twitter es el más moderno.
Esta respuesta la había hecho bien.
4-which is the most popular.
Cual es el mas popular
En esta respuesta me había equbicado porque use EST y como la palabra es larga se usa MOST.
5-Y m not going to use Facebook today.
Yo no use el facebook hoy.
Esta respuesta la había echo mal porque puse don’t
6-My sister was using on twitter when y phoned her yesterday.
Mi Hermana estaba usando el twitter cuando llame ayer
En esta me equivoque porque puse uses que es en presente y la oración esta en pasado
7-Y didn’t use Facebook yesterday because Y studied for my test.
Yo no use Facebook ayer porque yo estudie para mi examen.
En esta respuesta me equivoque porque use am not se usa para presente
8-What where you writing on Facebook yesterday?
Lo que te escribi ayer en facebook.
Esta respuesta estaba bien
9-Many people commented on Facebook yesterday.
Mucha gente comento en Facebook Ayer.
En esta respuesta me equivoque porque puse comment para pasado.
10-when y was a child. Facebook didn’t exist.
Cuando yo era niño el Facebook no existía.
En esta respuesta me equivoque porque puse not y el not es para el presente.
MADE BY JONATHAN MUÑOZ
TEACHER APRUEBEME
The facebook is better than the twiter and you prop mas easily damian berutti 2 b
Post a Comment